Peifer Unhappy with Budget Negotiations

Posted by Vic on Oct 1st, 2009 and filed under State. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

State Representative Mike Peifer

State Representative Mike Peifer

By Pat Camuso

“And that’s where we are today; they [Democrats] don’t have the votes in the House now.” Peifer said, “The blue dogs [moderate/fiscal conservative Democrats] are not going to vote for this…”

MILFORD – The only thing that has State Representative Mike Peifer even more disgusted than additional luxury-type taxes is the way that the Governor has handled the whole budget negotiation process from the start.

“Taxes that were added on theater tickets and small games of chance winnings – on our VFWs, Elks Lodges and organizations like that. I never even heard these things mentioned before this deal was cut,” said Peifer.

“There’s always talk about a severance tax, table games, smokeless tobacco has been discussed all year but things like theater tickets and small games of chance were never heard of. It’s like we [House of Representatives] have been excluded; we’ve been getting much of our information in small dribs and drabs from the papers. And when I say we are excluded – we are excluded.”

“I am disgusted with these two taxes. I think it’s horrible that they are even being considered,” said Peifer. “We [House] discussed income taxes, sales taxes, tobacco taxes, table games – all these things have been floated since last February. We know we have a problem but these two taxes are ridiculous.”

“And that’s where we are today; they [Democrats] don’t have the votes in the House now.” Peifer said, “The blue dogs [moderate/fiscal conservative Democrats] are not going to vote for this. That’s why we’re not in this week; they cancelled sessions Monday – because they don’t have the votes now.”

Peifer feels that the cuts should be spread out across the board so no one sector takes a hit. “It’s a $28 million dollar budget, we’re $2.8 million short so let’s cut everybody nine to ten percent. I’m happy with the spending on education; but don’t forget we have everything else – libraries, county reimbursements and everything else. We’re 2.8 million dollars short so cut everybody ten percent. Don’t cut libraries 38 percent; don’t eliminate programs. Cut everybody ten percent and everybody feels the pain. Cut Mike Peifer ten percent – cut everything ten percent. And when the revenues get better we’ll increase everyone.”

“That’s why we [House Republicans] were excluded because we tried everything to get the blue dogs to join us in our efforts and we almost had them several times to bring their 12 votes over with us but we couldn’t do it,” said Peifer. “This is why we have been excluded from current negotiations. It’s so convoluted that its hard to explain.”

“We knew this was going to be tough back in February; we knew we were going to have to make cuts or find new revenue sources or do both – and we have. There is rainy day monies we’re going to use, they did go into the M-Care funds of the tobacco settlements monies; we came up with a tax amnesty period which will generate some money. So we’re trying to find additional revenue. Table games are talked about and there are other options out there but we are going to also have to cut,” said Peifer.

“We have to be creative; we can’t just put up the white flag of surrender and say we’re going to raise the personal income tax and that’s what Ed Rendell wanted. He tried to create such a negative picture to pressure representatives to vote for income tax when in fact, there other ways that we can generate a billion dollars instead of raising the personal income tax. Rendell created a crisis, he’s good at this. He’s talented at being a tough negotiator. Creating a crisis is how he creates his bargaining chips. Holding back workers pay, child-care funding and all that, he’ll create a crisis and wear you out, yeah he’s good at that, but I don’t think people are going to vote for him anymore.”

4 Responses for “Peifer Unhappy with Budget Negotiations”

  1. Tammy Gillette says:

    Mike, please ensure that Rendell cannot again include any more spending of PA taxes given to his buddies at ACORN. PA has given ACORN at least $200,000 in taxpayer money already:

    just a partial list of PA funds to ACORN – http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tDqWwkpxIIGRpuEDWxdyhow&output=html

    “… a Pennsylvania Republican lawmaker’s attempt to bar politically active groups from receiving state money failed last week on a procedural vote in the Democratic-controlled state House. ACORN has been barred from legally soliciting contributions in Pennsylvania until it registers as a charitable organization or provides evidence that it is exempt from the registration law.”

    http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5i27n3VFJCj4et9SD2e_IiazM_3VgD9ASTDE01

  2. Gordon Olsommer says:

    Mike hit the nail right on the head! Rendell is famous for his strong arm tactics, and if they dont work, he puts the squeeze on the whole system. He makes the weak and fearful crumble under the stresses of the uncertainty he has created…

    Rendell has paraded around with his huge flamboyant money wasting plywood checks and photo opps as he parades from place to place, but the fact remains that HE broke the Commonwealth. Then he purports to blame the House and Senate; He is simply a BUM.

  3. John Galt says:

    Mike Peifer should be disgusted by any new tax, not just the two mentioned in the article. Pennsylvania should be reducing taxes at best, holding them steady at worst. They all need to learn that smaller government stimulates the economy.

  4. WTF says:

    Come on Mike. The tax on small games of chance and on arts & cultural groups is a Senate Republican initiative and nothing to do with Rendell or House Dems. Most House Dems oppose both and that is why the budget deal is now falling apart.

    Not taxing gas companies drlling in Pike County, opening up state forests in Pike County for more gas drilling and reducing the Department of Environmental protection’s buget by 25% to make it harder for DEP to regulate the drilling and enforce violations is also a Senate Republican initiative which most House Dems oppose.

    House Republicans are not at the table becuase they dont want to be. They are hiding behind their minority status and will all vote against the budget, whatever it is, so they can absolve themselves for all blame for cuts in services and tax increases.

    This budget is all about the 2010 election and Republicans need to capture the majority in the House so they and their Senate Republican masters can control the gerrymandering that will happen after the 2011 census.

    Therefore the Senate Republicans (only half of them up for re-election in 2010 and those in vundebale setats voting NO to the budget) are safe with their 10 seat majority and with House Republicans all voting NO the pressure will be on House Democrats that vote to pass a budget with the Senate R’s trojan horses.

Leave a Reply

Viagra | Levitra | Cialis | Viagra Online | Tramadol